Cupra 280 V Golf R on Track (2 tests in wet and dry - Autocar I think) Cupra won again.
I have both those road tests in front of me. Autocar do a dry circuit time and a lap on a wet track. Thing is that it was raining the day they tested the Golf so both its laps were wet. Times were:
Dry circuit: Leon 1:15.4 Golf 1:17.4 (described in the mag as streaming wet)
Wet circuit: Leon 1:15.7 Golf 1:14
I don't think any of those times constitute a win, as the dry lap time for the Golf can't really be counted. The Golf also did 0-60 in those same streaming wet conditions in 4.8 seconds.
I have both those road tests in front of me. Autocar do a dry circuit time and a lap on a wet track. Thing is that it was raining the day they tested the Golf so both its laps were wet. Times were:
Dry circuit: Leon 1:15.4 Golf 1:17.4 (described in the mag as streaming wet)
Wet circuit: Leon 1:15.7 Golf 1:14
I don't think any of those times constitute a win, as the dry lap time for the Golf can't really be counted. The Golf also did 0-60 in those same streaming wet conditions in 4.8 seconds.
If you can"t believe (as you said previously) magazine road tests, you think all the dealers are Muppets and based on the track test above , why did you go for a Leon ?
In addition the timings are one thing, but how difficult was it to get those times in each car? The driver of the Golf could step out looking like he'd been 10 rounds with Tyson , the Leon driver like he'd been to the shops. ( I don't know, I've not read the articles).
You have complained about many issues on your car, but then refuse to take it to a dealers to get it sorted. If you are that concerned that all of the staff who work at dealers are useless , why buy a new car? Get yourself a 5 year old model of your liking, with the change buy a load of tools and look after it yourself..
I'll explain, shall I? This car is both my first ever new car and my first SEAT. It is specifically SEAT dealers and, to an extent, my SEAT car that I think are rubbish. This is a forum for SEAT enthusiasts/owners, so I'm hardly going to join a Mercedes forum to bitch about my car, as where would that get me? Nearly all of these one marque forums are full of people wearing blinkers who think their car/make of car is the best thing ever and get all uppity when someone like me and the OP come along and say it might not be the bestest car ever, but for every blinkered fool getting the arse with my posts there could be someone reading who is considering buying a SEAT. If I can put just one of those readers off doing just that then I'll consider my time spent here worthwhile!
I'm with you mate. Thanks for speaking out. I wish I hadn't bought it. I don't need to 'man up' and I won't adapt to driving around slowly because the car keeps breaking traction. I'm certainly not going to spend a further 1200 quid on new wheels and sticky tyres because in my opinion, I've spent 28k and I expect it to grip!![]()
To the OP, I have sympathy with you for being so disappointed but I think this is a lesson to others that you should research what you are buying and consider what reviewers are actually comparing the Cupra to. Personally I love my Cupra but I know it has limitations and I expected these when I put the deposit down:
The Cupra is a front wheel drive hot hatch. It costs £28000. How you expected it to even nearly compare with a 4wd Mitsubishi Evo that I gather costs upwards of £45,000 when bought new is beyond me. Forgive me if I have mistinterpreted your expectations on that subject.
I agree that some of the reviews have represented hyperbole. Loads of them have commented favourably regarding stability, traction and lack of torque steer. Compared to my old Astra VXR, however, this car is light years ahead on these things. Compared to a car that can apply power through all 4 wheels, however, and I can't see how it is physically possible (certainly for £28,000) to lay down power as well - particularly in the wet.
Unless someone can completely redesign a car to place the centre of gravity much much closer to the driven wheels, the fundamental limitations of a hot hatch will never change. They will also always be comparably more affordable bhp for bhp compared to a 4wd car.
I'll explain, shall I? This car is both my first ever new car and my first SEAT. It is specifically SEAT dealers and, to an extent, my SEAT car that I think are rubbish. This is a forum for SEAT enthusiasts/owners, so I'm hardly going to join a Mercedes forum to bitch about my car, as where would that get me? Nearly all of these one marque forums are full of people wearing blinkers who think their car/make of car is the best thing ever and get all uppity when someone like me and the OP come along and say it might not be the bestest car ever, but for every blinkered fool getting the arse with my posts there could be someone reading who is considering buying a SEAT. If I can put just one of those readers off doing just that then I'll consider my time spent here worthwhile!
I have both those road tests in front of me. Autocar do a dry circuit time and a lap on a wet track. Thing is that it was raining the day they tested the Golf so both its laps were wet. Times were:
Dry circuit: Leon 1:15.4 Golf 1:17.4 (described in the mag as streaming wet)
Wet circuit: Leon 1:15.7 Golf 1:14
I don't think any of those times constitute a win, as the dry lap time for the Golf can't really be counted. The Golf also did 0-60 in those same streaming wet conditions in 4.8 seconds.