ChrisGTL - MK1 LCR 225 - Going from APR to REVO

ChrisGTL

'Awesome' LCR225
Nov 17, 2007
2,459
2
Huddersfield
Now running REVO.

Initial thought are;

REVO has more grunt lower down than the APR
REVO tails off quicker at high RPM than the REVO
REVO seems to return higher MPG (but still early days to say for certain)

I was worried about the tyres wanting to spin up with the REVO, but theres very little difference between the APR and REVO from what i've seen so far. Yes the tyres do want to spin up but its easily controlled by introducing the power instead of just planting it.

Ran some logs last night of the REVO and my MAF figures are very similar, boost figures are higher around the 3k-3.5k region and i've gone from having high 6 CF's on the APR to 0.8/2 CF's on the REVO.

So ov course I added 3.0 degrees of timing and re-logged, now getting 5.3CF's and a couple 6CF's dotted around.

Car is feeling quicker everytime I go for a drive so I'm presuming it needs to adjust itself to suit.

Very happy indeed, was a tough choice to swap to REVO as the APR was so driveable in a 2WD car, I've certainly not lost any power with the REVO it just feels more eager to go using lower RPM.

Maybe all the powerflex bushes I changed to made the difference in terms of grip as i'm only using Falken 452's on the front.

------
Edit

MAP Actuals

Code:
MAP mbar		
RPM	APR1	REVO
2000		
2160		
2360		
2680		
3000		
3320		
3640	2350	2510
3920	2370	2460
4200	2370	2390
4480	2370	2320
4760	2300	2290
5080	2240	2250
5360	2240	2220
5600	2210	2200
5840	2180	2210
6040	2120	2170
6240	2130	2110
6440	2130	2150
6600	2070	2080
6760	2000	2060
6880	2020	2080
7000	2070	1990
7120	2060	2050
7200	1970	1990

MAF Actuals

Code:
MAF g/s		
RPM	APR1	REVO
2000		
2120		
2320		
2520		
2720		
3000	116	119.31
3280	134.08	138.97
3600	151.75	137.67
3840	153.72	145.44
4120	159.83	149.64
4400	164.14	154.39
4600	168.97	159.25
4840	176.86	165.06
5040	184.69	168.75
5240	188.25	179
5440	193.92	185.47
5600	197.03	190.03
5720	194.94	188.47
5800	198.39	193.08
5960	195.58	190.31
6040	196.53	190.92
6120	197.81	193.08
6240	202.56	195.58
6320	202.33	196.53
6400	196.83	196.22
6520	200.94	195.72
 
Last edited:

ChrisGTL

'Awesome' LCR225
Nov 17, 2007
2,459
2
Huddersfield
Hi chris could you amend the last post to show which holds boost better at the red line please.

Have done! I shall relog in a couple days as I think the car is adapting and getting quicker.

Have a look here: http://www.seatcupra.net/forums/showthread.php?p=2603869#post2603869 get a lot of scratches out I thought were not possible with the non matalic. Seems to be softer generally...

Cheers Maz. Thats alot of products used though, but does look very good after you rubbed your special juices into the paintwork.

Those scratches around the door handle are exactly the same as mine, looks gash! Looks a different car afterwards.
 

ChrisGTL

'Awesome' LCR225
Nov 17, 2007
2,459
2
Huddersfield
Nice car mate best colour as well same as mine :D

Black beauty!! Cheers for the approval :)


UPDATE:

EBC Ultimax discs and Ferodo DS2500's now on the car. Had the 2500's on my previous TDI and boy have I missed them or what!! Just about bedded in now but god they feel sharp!

Lovely jubbly!
 

leon cupra r

Back in an LCR!
Nov 10, 2009
902
0
Barnsley
Alright Chris, glad to see you went for the brake upgrade in the end! bet you are loving the difference, feels so much safer driving quickly with em doesnt it!

What did you make on the rollers? I presume the new sig pic was taken after your revo reflash?
 

tyrer

OEM
Jun 6, 2010
1,991
1
I wish I understood logs!

The more I see the Toyo cooler the more I get tempted, great mods mate
 

ChrisGTL

'Awesome' LCR225
Nov 17, 2007
2,459
2
Huddersfield
Hows the car running now? is it better on revo than APR? better with a new MAF?

Car is running sound as a pound mate, its had some money spend on it over the last couple months. Cambelt kit, oil, filter, plugs, MAF.......temp sender, two new coilpacks on standby.

REVO or APR? Hmm, hard one to answer. I like them both, I'd say REVO for crazyness and APR for smooth progressive power.

REVO is looking good now I've managed to drive it on half decent temp tarmac, REVO was so smooth low down so it was alot eaiser to drive in tricky conditions.

Any difference with new MAF? Yes, slight difference in that when I'm sat at 20-30mph on an incline and I want to accelerate slightly I find that the engine is alot quicker to deliver the torque when I press down on pedal slightly.

I've run some logs with the new MAF and got 206g/s but I need better run, my redline run was straight after lots of slow driving and not sure if the intercooler got enough cold air before the log.

I shall relog and post when I get chance.

I wish I understood logs!

The more I see the Toyo cooler the more I get tempted, great mods mate

Toyo cooler is great! Turbo is very appreciative of it. :) Thanks :D
 

ChrisGTL

'Awesome' LCR225
Nov 17, 2007
2,459
2
Huddersfield
1st log after new MAF and REVO Linear map.

Code:
RPM	Load	Inj. On Time	Mass Flow		Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization	Idle Stabilization
				TIME				
 /min	%	 ms	 g/s	STAMP	 CF	 CF	 CF	 CF
2160	75.2	6.46	33	809.4	0	0	0	0
2840	60.9	4.42	22.25	810.3	0	0	0	0
1960	92.5	8.84	37.53	811.21	0	0	0	0
2360	109.8	9.18	53.61	812.01	0	0	0	0
2920	127.8	11.9	71.81	812.82	0	0	0	0
2840	19.5	2.38	10.22	813.62	0	0	0	0
2200	86.5	7.82	40.58	814.42	0	0	0	0
2440	112	10.54	56.08	815.24	0	0	0	0
2760	142.1	13.6	83.75	816.14	0	3	1.5	0
3160	191.7	21.42	137.22	816.94	0	3	1.5	0
3800	191.7	22.78	164.83	817.85	3	3	0.8	3
4360	191.7	21.42	171.61	818.76	3	3.8	0.8	3
4880	191.7	21.08	185	819.56	2.3	3.8	0.8	3
5320	191.7	20.4	199.44	820.46	0.8	3.8	0	1.5
5800	188	20.74	205.97	821.37	0	3	0.8	0.8
6200	168.4	18.02	212.25	822.17	0	2.3	0	0.8
6520	175.9	17	213.97	822.98	0	2.3	0	0.8
 
Progressive Parts, performance parts and tuning specialists