Results look good Willie, its nice to see the figures on paper even if it creates a debate LOL.
So how can John be pulling 370ft-lbs of torque with the same MAP as mine and I'm running max MAP pressure between 3,000-5,000 RPMS?
Cheers Phill
Cheers Phill
Let me be the first to say it, I doubt the results.
Joking
really good figures. What people need to remember is the look of the graph not the figures. Yes it's very high boost but you never know might last for a while. I personally think willie wants a new turbo
Joking
really good figures. What people need to remember is the look of the graph not the figures. Yes it's very high boost but you never know might last for a while. I personally think willie wants a new turbo
I might be needing a new turbo after I let hamfisted idiots work on my carLet me be the first to say it, I doubt the results.
Joking
But have a price for a turbo redress
Thats why i do 99.9% of the work on my car my self, i know some times you have to let someone else near it.
Yup that was the problem, nothing I could do at homeThats why i do 99.9% of the work on my car my self, i know some times you have to let someone else near it.
If you don't mind me asking Willie, what happened to your car? Totally understand if its all hush hush etc
Leaking exhaust flanges that needed rewelded and gear stick selector issuesIf you don't mind me asking Willie, what happened to your car? Totally understand if its all hush hush etc
VR6T
Guest
Willie just been looking into the boost readings that are on the plots and i would like to know where they connected there tube to the car.
Good to hear
Those figures from last night are top notch fella, that map sounds ace, especially with more headroom to play with
Any further mods to appear soon? Or is it all still on hold with other things ongoing?
They tried to pull the DV vacuum line off but didn't manage so pulled the FPR one and 'T' into this. I trust your figures over theirs.
VR6T
Guest
VR6T
Guest
Here is a copy of the VAGCOM log data we did at 22deg ambient (June 2010) and 4 deg ambient (this week). If you look at the data you can see that the map sensor doesn't see the boost that was shown on the RR plot. It reels it in as expected..
You can also see that your turbo is lagging a little behind on the requested but the car was still 1 second quicker on log 2... I wish i had taken a note of the atmospheric pressure for the two logs to show how this off set the performance..
Legend:-
RPML1 = Log 1 revs 22 degrees outside air temp
PRML2 = Log 2 revs 4 degrees outside air temp
BOOST R1 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A1 = Log 1 Boost actual
BOOST R2 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A2 = Log 1 Boost actual
You can also see that your turbo is lagging a little behind on the requested but the car was still 1 second quicker on log 2... I wish i had taken a note of the atmospheric pressure for the two logs to show how this off set the performance..
Legend:-
RPML1 = Log 1 revs 22 degrees outside air temp
PRML2 = Log 2 revs 4 degrees outside air temp
BOOST R1 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A1 = Log 1 Boost actual
BOOST R2 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A2 = Log 1 Boost actual
Here is a copy of the VAGCOM log data we did at 22deg ambient (June 2010) and 4 deg ambient (this week). If you look at the data you can see that the map sensor doesn't see the boost that was shown on the RR plot. It reels it in as expected..
You can also see that your turbo is lagging a little behind on the requested but the car was still 1 second quicker on log 2... I wish i had taken a note of the atmospheric pressure for the two logs to show how this off set the performance..
Legend:-
RPML1 = Log 1 revs 22 degrees outside air temp
PRML2 = Log 2 revs 4 degrees outside air temp
BOOST R1 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A1 = Log 1 Boost actual
BOOST R2 = Log 1 Boost requested
BOOST A2 = Log 1 Boost actual
fella.. you do realise the map sensor cannot read more than 22psi yea? so the dynos 5 bar map sensor is actually reading it as it was....... 26-27psi peak.
Similar threads
