As mentioned below looking at a 2nd hand FR TFSI,
Plenty around with the DSG gearbox - whats the consensus on this ?
I know they are supposed to be good but I'd worry about reliability and cost/resale etc
cheers
Even though im a massive VAG fanboy I would avoid it, if you like to modify your car or do trackdays.
My FR DSG run's fine at 269BHP, I've had a revo remap, neuspeed CAI, full supersprint exhaust system uprated fuel pump and had no problems, handles the extra power very well in my opinion. I also know of a few ppl running big turbo upgrades on a dsg box and no problems there.
So I wouldn't say if you modify don't get.
As for avoiding paddle shifters if you do trackdays...well all i can say is why is the (track only) Ferrari FXX a paddle shifter, or the Maserati MC12 (track only) a paddle shifter, the Seat Cupra Championship cars are all 6spd DSG paddle shifters...
So I wouldn't say don't get if you do trackdays
I thought JC hated "flappy paddles" .
The thing is when doing a big turbo upgrade you will require a uprated clutch at some point, and they are expensive. Audi couldnt utilise the DSG box throughtout the range on transverse fitted engines as the DSG box can only handle so much torque reliably. I cant remember the exact figure that the DSG box can handle in torque but could always find out for you.
The thing with comparing the likes of the paddle shift in the fxx and mc12 is that they are extremely different in their designed purpose. Also remember that the majority of hardcore track cars still use a good old fashioned manual gearbox. Audi's R8 and Lambos dont use DSG, they had to make use of R-tronic.
...never the less it still contains rubbing parts.No pc can shift better than man,still.
The future generation of AT's is purely hydrolic,the patent is nought by MB i think.
Untill that becomes reality no AT for me