True.... but you have to also consider the amount of research and development that goes into producing these kits. As we all know its not just a matter of knocking a few pipes together, there are many factors to think about i.e. properly scaled maf housings, ability to flow a sufficient amount of air aswell as keeping intake temperatures as low as possible etc...
As with anything, you get what you pay for IMO.
Like was already said, R&D my ass.. Im well aware of R&D costs, but for an intake like this..
It takes maybe a couple of hours to desing it, sourcing the correct parts will take longer. Especially since similar "filter on a stick" type of intakes have been around for years for theses engines. And for some companies their R&D costs didnt even cover checking the correct maf housing size! Id say most of their focus is in fitment, not function.
Id like to see how many different prototypes some of the intakes on market have seen, my quess is that first time was the charm for most of them. Of course there are items that are better designed then others, usually those manufacturers also publish dyno graphs or other measurements of their intakes. Hats off for those.
You can apply the same logic you have said for pretty much everything , but if people are willing to spend that money then so be it , it might sound expensive but the gains have been tested and the filter is ideally suited to Revo software , and its not jus a pipe and filter mashed together , i to understand R and D costs been a mechanical engineer to 20+ years , again you get what you pay for , its a very well made kit which actually does what it says on the box.
Have you seen the price of a full exhaust assy from some manufacturers ? £1000+ , Well thats another 1 of these cost v RD v materials but dont get me started on that 1 lol
Like was already said, R&D my ass.. Im well aware of R&D costs, but for an intake like this..
It takes maybe a couple of hours to desing it, sourcing the correct parts will take longer. Especially since similar "filter on a stick" type of intakes have been around for years for theses engines. And for some companies their R&D costs didnt even cover checking the correct maf housing size! Id say most of their focus is in fitment, not function.
Id like to see how many different prototypes some of the intakes on market have seen, my quess is that first time was the charm for most of them. Of course there are items that are better designed then others, usually those manufacturers also publish dyno graphs or other measurements of their intakes. Hats off for those.
Actually you cannot apply the same logic to everything, I certainly will not. Im now only talking about intakes for cupra in general and not saying that this intake doesnt produce horsepower gains. Im sure it does very well by the looks of it.
You can argue all you want but it doesnt change the fact that its bloody expensive for what someone would pay for the parts sold seperately.
Even with these inflated prices these units seem to sell, so congrats for the manufactures for doing business (also with the downpipe business lol)
I would like the filter to be bigger with the ITG design ...so many choices though (at the moment Im aiming for the ITG but now I seen the BM one im kinda changing my mind then theres the FORGE twin...I'll leave mine standard until I get my map
Fitted in the rain Love the noise! Definately doesnt feel stronger, less so at the minute to be honest :s
Think it will be adapting.... Watch this space
Not too keen on the design of the ITG one sorry :S Gonna stick with the Forge twintake whenever thats out
Not too keen on the design of the ITG one sorry :S Gonna stick with the Forge twintake whenever thats out
eye candy is not everything
I am still wanting to see bhp/ft-lbs, logs and an arse dyno opinion before I sell my Dbilas.
Logs, arse dyno, I think this thread is getting a little strange or even (pub landlord mode on)
Nowt wrong with a log taken on a laptop by someone with an arse dyno