The torque reading is what vag com showed on test drive after the map
The torque reading on Vag Com onlworks accurately on std cars, once its remapped you can't rely on it.
The torque reading is what vag com showed on test drive after the map
The torque reading on Vag Com onlworks accurately on std cars, once its remapped you can't rely on it.
Same goes for a random rolling road.....
im not qualified enough to talk bout all this so....
MY OPINION i would buy filter first.
No, an RR is about as accurate as the torque reading on a std car. The torque reading on remapped car is about as accurate as my mate jack telling me my 0-60 is 3 secs cuz he timed on his Timex while I sped past his bedroom window.
yeh just spoke to pete the now, he says won't make any difference at all wether i put it in before or after...only bi*ch is though, that beacause i've had an apr trial he reckons something might be wrong with the ecu n that it would require him to solder the ecu???... im a bit annoyed if that the case... should i contact APR???
Can Sarah shed any light on this please?
is what for £250 or £295 ?
I'm nosey
What facts do you base it on?
People have repeated back to back tests with std, panel filter, induction kit, enclosed induction kit, relocated induction kit - with otherwise standardised components & have shown either no gain, or minimal loses or minimal gains from a any modified components when compared to a paper filter.
If it's a question of air fuel, an accurately reading MAF ensures that's right (along with MAP etc)
I'm not knocking any products, just not sure why you think it makes a blind bit of difference at this level of tuning
I've always been of the opinion that the map comes last. The map will be based on many variables, many of which can be affected by changing engine parts, even if they are only minor bolt-on parts. Now I appreciate that they may only make a tiny difference, but it's a difference none the less.
I'm no mechanic so I'm not for one second going to argue with somebody obviously more clued up than me. But I personally would prefer to know the map I'm getting - assuming we're talking custom here - is based around the exact setup of my engine and related items. Even minor changes can have an affect so I'd personally want it to be as accurate as possible.
You're presuming that:
1) there's something wrong with the OE kit you're removing
2) that the resolution / tools used to taylor the map effectively
3) old sk00l tech that didn't have adaptive & clever ECU's