Noooooooo! Diesel buddy! Say it ain't so!
To be fair, I understand where you're coming from. If I'm going into a ULEZ area I'm either taking public transport or the motorbike.
The emissions are the only thing that really make me want to get rid at the moment. There's no demand for retrofitting a nearly twenty year old car with a DPF, which would solve most of my problems in one, but even if I managed to do that, there's no certification for something like that, so the government would just treat the car as though it polluted the same and so tax and everything would be the same.
Part of me thinks an engine swap could be really interesting. Structurally the car is spot on, so it seems a shame to get rid as I know it would probably be scrapped.
Should just be called anti-diesel zones. The petrol R is exempt from everything but still chucks out loads of CO2.
I know it's more complicated, what with the diesels putting out NOx, but it does frustrate me when I look at a petrol Suzuki Swift on Auto Trader and the CO2 emissions are broadly similar for a car that's less powerful and with a smaller engine. It's like the engines aren't any more efficient, but the exhausts are just better at catching the particles on their way out. If that's the case, why not allow us to retrofit our cars with maybe a cartridge system for the DPF that can be either replaced or cleaned?
Overall it just sucks because there are things I need to do on the car - getting the paint on the bonnet sorted, cleaning the intake manifold and changing the clutch - but all three take time or money and I just don't know if they're worth doing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk