silica grain in the header tank

  • Thread starter Deleted member 103408
  • Start date

SteveGSXR600K1

Active Member
May 6, 2017
588
193
Is there an easy way of knowing if you've got the revised expansion tank below? From the cut-away picture, it's difficult to work out if the silicate is still a large sack or a pellet of some sort. Does anyone have a part number for this revised tank?

1606724430901.png
 

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
Is there an easy way of knowing if you've got the revised expansion tank below? From the cut-away picture, it's difficult to work out if the silicate is still a large sack or a pellet of some sort. Does anyone have a part number for this revised tank?

View attachment 20142
If your tank says MIT Silicat on it then it will either be this design 'container' - or the 'tea bag' design?
If the 'tea bag' design you can see if you look through the top of the filler neck.
If the 'container' design you can't see it from the filler neck.

My tank is 5Q0 121 407 A and it says Mit Silicate and has the 'silicate container' like in the diagram above, and my car is 2014 Leon ST 184 TDI - there is no way to inspect the integrity of the 'container' unless you cut the tank in half!

1606730896785.png


There are LOTS of OE number supersessions - I believe 5Q0 121 407 M is the latest version.
Even though I have what I would consider a 'safer' design i'm still changing it to a tank with NO silicate.

My car has done 90,000 miles and there are two reasons for blocking the heater matrix - either left over casting sand from the engine production or from the silicat in the header tank.

It seems strange to me that my car would only start to block the header tank after 80k miles if it were the casting sand - why not sooner! So I still think silicat in the header tank may be to blame?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SEAT Rule

RUM4MO

Active Member
Jun 4, 2008
7,970
1,060
South Scotland
I'd guess, but only a guess, that as that diagram shows a raised "bump" on the upper surface, then if you had Mit Silikat and that raised bump, it would not be the "tea bag" version.

On the subject of casting sand, do you not think that it might take differing and maybe random length of time to get enough of the remaining casting sand out and along to the heater matrix? I'd think that what was thought to be adequate clearing out of the sand from castings had been done - but for too many that was not enough to get it all out.

Edit:- my "not industrial" employed Chemical Dr daughter was a bit unsure as to what/why this silicate was in there, in as much as "is it just coated with a slow dissolving coolant additive to keep the PH level towards the alkaline side of things" or "are these granules actually the product that is getting dissolved and so reducing in physical size" - maybe someone out there knows the absolute answer to that, no guessing though!

Another edit:- maybe that bump is on all these tanks as the small returning coolant pipe must connect to the tank somehow!
 
Last edited:

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
I'd guess, but only a guess, that as that diagram shows a raised "bump" on the upper surface, then if you had Mit Silikat and that raised bump, it would not be the "tea bag" version.

On the subject of casting sand, do you not think that it might take differing and maybe random length of time to get enough of the remaining casting sand out and along to the heater matrix? I'd think that what was thought to be adequate clearing out of the sand from castings had been done - but for too many that was not enough to get it all out.

Edit:- my "not industrial" employed Chemical Dr daughter was a bit unsure as to what/why this silicate was in there, in as much as "is it just coated with a slow dissolving coolant additive to keep the PH level towards the alkaline side of things" or "are these granules actually the product that is getting dissolved and so reducing in physical size" - maybe someone out there knows the absolute answer to that, no guessing though!

Another edit:- maybe that bump is on all these tanks as the small returning coolant pipe must connect to the tank somehow!

Yes, they ALL have this raised bump - it is just the flow return connection.
One visible difference though is earlier versions (like mine) have an internal path for overflow coolant - via a hole at the bottom, and the later ones G and M have an external pathway for expelled coolant to the side, I guess so it is more obvious if your tank has been leaking - like your overflow on your boiler at home must be visible.

There is absolutely an allowed 'tolerance' for the amount of casting sand remaining in the block/heads from production - they will/should have tested this, so the vehicle remains reliable with a certain amount of sand in the cooling system, and with these modern complicated internal shapes i'm sure it will be more difficult to remove the sand. This will be a balance of time spent cleaning the internal passage ways vs money cost in warranty/failure/blockage, i'm sure this tolerance will have been tightened on newer cars.

this is what I collected out of my heater matrix on the last flush I did in March:
Anyone know if this is Silicate from the header tank - or remains of casting sand from engine production?

edited as the picture had changed a bit dark!
1606743613286.png

Zoomed in but a bit blurry
1606743463128.png

1606743533144.png
 

Attachments

  • 1606734876916.png
    1606734876916.png
    50.1 KB · Views: 193
  • 1606743402177.png
    1606743402177.png
    74.4 KB · Views: 239
Last edited:

SEAT Rule

Active Member
Nov 19, 2019
188
62
Yes, they ALL have this raised bump - it is just the flow return connection.
One visible difference though is earlier versions (like mine) have an internal path for overflow coolant - via a hole at the bottom, and the later ones G and M have an external pathway for expelled coolant to the side, I guess so it is more obvious if your tank has been leaking - like your overflow on your boiler at home must be visible.

There is absolutely an allowed 'tolerance' for the amount of casting sand remaining in the block/heads from production - they will/should have tested this, so the vehicle remains reliable with a certain amount of sand in the cooling system, and with these modern complicated internal shapes i'm sure it will be more difficult to remove the sand. This will be a balance of time spent cleaning the internal passage ways vs money cost in warranty/failure/blockage, i'm sure this tolerance will have been tightened on newer cars.

this is what I collected out of my heater matrix on the last flush I did in March:
Anyone know if this is Silicate from the header tank - or remains of casting sand from engine production?

edited as the picture had changed a bit dark!
View attachment 20155
Zoomed in but a bit blurry
View attachment 20153
View attachment 20154

In your photos it does look more like fine grit which possibly is as you say casting sand ?
To be honest you're always going to get some kind of fine abrasive particles from any engine that's water cooled, antifreeze can help against corrosion but it can't fully prevent it, small particles from inside the engine block or cylinder head are going to wear away or partly dissolve making the coolant semi abrasive, including other bits wearing away from inside the radiator core tubes or heater matrix, and thermostat possibly even water pump.

Looking on Etka at Audi, SEAT, Skoda and VW, they all share the same part numbers, it's only I think the first 3 digits that are different between the 4 VAG manufacturers. I've read through this whole thread and done some research on like I say Etka and online elsewhere, below is what I managed to find out regarding the expansion bottle for SEAT Leon 2012 onwards.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.2 and 1.4 1.6 2.0 litre engines
From 2012 onwards.
This can have silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407D
1.2 and 1.6 litre diesel engines late 2012 onwards
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.8 litre engine up to mid 2014
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407G
1.8 litre engine after mid 2014 up until roughly early/mid 2019 I think.
This can have I think the semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate, possibly unable to remove ?

Part number 5Q0 121 407T
From late 2018 or early 2019 to roughly early/mid 2020
Semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate cartridge, possibly unable to remove.

Part number 5Q0 121 407M
From early/mid 2020 onwards.
This new design has no silicate inside bag or cartridge.

The words Mit Silikat = silicate, don't always appear on the expansion bottle, but they can still contain the silicate with part numbers ending in A, D, G and T
The part number ending in M definitely has no silicate inside, as others have already mentioned in this thread.
Also looking at the cutaway image that's been uploaded in this thread, possibly part number ending in G or T, it looks to me as if the silicate bag/cartridge has to be positioned very close to the return inlet port, so it receives a constant flow of hot coolant once up to temp to flow over or around it, to help stimulate it to filter out more chemical into the coolant so to speak.

Regarding the G13 antifreeze as others have already mentioned in this thread it's made using mostly glycerin, as it's much less harmful to the environment, plus from what I've read they add silicate to G13 to give more safe protection against aluminium, cast iron and magnesium alloys, plus in some later cars if they still had any copper/brass or lead materials in radiator core or heater matrix or thermostat, the extra silicate is ment to aid protection against those also, otherwise with out silicate it possibly can weaken or eat into them, but if these are present copper/brass or lead in any of the cooling system materials, it might have a side effect where it degrades the silicate bag even faster, possibly even turning the coolant colour slightly darker ??

Plus anything made of plastic or nylon that's fully submerged in oil or water, and exposed to extremely high temperatures for long periods, is going to degrade over time, possibly 4 or 5 years, or less ??

Hope this helps
Si
 

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
In your photos it does look more like fine grit which possibly is as you say casting sand ?
To be honest you're always going to get some kind of fine abrasive particles from any engine that's water cooled, antifreeze can help against corrosion but it can't fully prevent it, small particles from inside the engine block or cylinder head are going to wear away or partly dissolve making the coolant semi abrasive, including other bits wearing away from inside the radiator core tubes or heater matrix, and thermostat possibly even water pump.

Looking on Etka at Audi, SEAT, Skoda and VW, they all share the same part numbers, it's only I think the first 3 digits that are different between the 4 VAG manufacturers. I've read through this whole thread and done some research on like I say Etka and online elsewhere, below is what I managed to find out regarding the expansion bottle for SEAT Leon 2012 onwards.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.2 and 1.4 1.6 2.0 litre engines
From 2012 onwards.
This can have silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407D
1.2 and 1.6 litre diesel engines late 2012 onwards
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.8 litre engine up to mid 2014
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407G
1.8 litre engine after mid 2014 up until roughly early/mid 2019 I think.
This can have I think the semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate, possibly unable to remove ?

Part number 5Q0 121 407T
From late 2018 or early 2019 to roughly early/mid 2020
Semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate cartridge, possibly unable to remove.

Part number 5Q0 121 407M
From early/mid 2020 onwards.
This new design has no silicate inside bag or cartridge.

The words Mit Silikat = silicate, don't always appear on the expansion bottle, but they can still contain the silicate with part numbers ending in A, D, G and T
The part number ending in M definitely has no silicate inside, as others have already mentioned in this thread.
Also looking at the cutaway image that's been uploaded in this thread, possibly part number ending in G or T, it looks to me as if the silicate bag/cartridge has to be positioned very close to the return inlet port, so it receives a constant flow of hot coolant once up to temp to flow over or around it, to help stimulate it to filter out more chemical into the coolant so to speak.

Regarding the G13 antifreeze as others have already mentioned in this thread it's made using mostly glycerin, as it's much less harmful to the environment, plus from what I've read they add silicate to G13 to give more safe protection against aluminium, cast iron and magnesium alloys, plus in some later cars if they still had any copper/brass or lead materials in radiator core or heater matrix or thermostat, the extra silicate is ment to aid protection against those also, otherwise with out silicate it possibly can weaken or eat into them, but if these are present copper/brass or lead in any of the cooling system materials, it might have a side effect where it degrades the silicate bag even faster, possibly even turning the coolant colour slightly darker ??

Plus anything made of plastic or nylon that's fully submerged in oil or water, and exposed to extremely high temperatures for long periods, is going to degrade over time, possibly 4 or 5 years, or less ??

Hope this helps
Si
Interesting info - just to add/confirm:
My Leon (2014 184TDI) has header tank 5Q0 121 407A and I can confirm it says Mit silicate and has the inner chamber type silicate which you are unable to remove/inspect.
Agree 5Q0 121 407M is the latest revision and this is without silicate.
 

SteveFR

Active Member
Dec 7, 2016
94
14
Bucks
I‘m unsure which header tank version my 1.8 TSI currently has but wondering whether it is something that should be replaced :unsure:

As local garage fitted a new heater matrix last week when climate control stopped warming the cabin (water pump, thermostat housing and temp sensor were done last summer following a P2681 code) but perhaps the expansion tank is another ticking time-bomb ?

012D9DD1-00BE-45E4-A119-803234FD14DE.jpeg 82D99E43-ABD2-4928-859F-FD8AB4F85520.jpeg
 

BillyCool

Active Member
Jan 16, 2020
707
276
Leicestershire, UK
I‘m unsure which header tank version my 1.8 TSI currently has but wondering whether it is something that should be replaced :unsure:

As local garage fitted a new heater matrix last week when climate control stopped warming the cabin (water pump, thermostat housing and temp sensor were done last summer following a P2681 code) but perhaps the expansion tank is another ticking time-bomb ?

View attachment 20264 View attachment 20265

In my opinion, it's worth doing.

If your silicant bag has split and contributed to the failed heater matrix, the expansion tank is effectively compromised and could continue to contaminate the system.

I got mine without a bag for £25 and it was 10 mins to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveFR

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
I‘m unsure which header tank version my 1.8 TSI currently has but wondering whether it is something that should be replaced :unsure:

As local garage fitted a new heater matrix last week when climate control stopped warming the cabin (water pump, thermostat housing and temp sensor were done last summer following a P2681 code) but perhaps the expansion tank is another ticking time-bomb ?

View attachment 20264 View attachment 20265
The part number is on the bottom - but it says Mit Silicat - so includes silicate repository.
 

SEAT Rule

Active Member
Nov 19, 2019
188
62
As above so possibly is one of these part numbers below that I listed in my previous post.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.8 litre engine up to mid 2014
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407G
1.8 litre engine after mid 2014 up until roughly early/mid 2019 I think.
This can have I think the semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate, possibly unable to remove ?

Si
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveFR

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
As above so possibly is one of these part numbers below that I listed in my previous post.

Part number 5Q0 121 407A
1.8 litre engine up to mid 2014
This has silicate bag.

Part number 5Q0 121 407G
1.8 litre engine after mid 2014 up until roughly early/mid 2019 I think.
This can have I think the semi sealed inner chamber containing the silicate, possibly unable to remove ?

Si
As posted above my Leon (2014 184TDI) has header tank 5Q0 121 407A and I can confirm it says Mit silicate and has the inner chamber type silicate which you are unable to remove/inspect.
 

BigJase88

Jase
Apr 20, 2008
3,767
1,076
All that anybody needs to know is take the awful things out and just replace the coolant every 2/3 years.

SEAT service guy even admitted to me when i pressed on him that it was a major own goal for the entire VAG group the whole silica-gate
 

RUM4MO

Active Member
Jun 4, 2008
7,970
1,060
South Scotland
All that anybody needs to know is take the awful things out and just replace the coolant every 2/3 years.

SEAT service guy even admitted to me when i pressed on him that it was a major own goal for the entire VAG group the whole silica-gate

The problem is that there are a few of us who do all our own servicing AND have enquiring minds, so really do like to be able to understand why all this happened so as to be able to work out if our cars do need extra coolant changes or something else.
Fair enough there will be some people who have no technical ability and because of that no interest in what caused this or anything else, and are just happy to believe anything that they read as being true/facts - but I'm not one of them.
 

SuperV8

Active Member
May 30, 2019
1,545
685
The problem is that there are a few of us who do all our own servicing AND have enquiring minds, so really do like to be able to understand why all this happened so as to be able to work out if our cars do need extra coolant changes or something else.
Fair enough there will be some people who have no technical ability and because of that no interest in what caused this or anything else, and are just happy to believe anything that they read as being true/facts - but I'm not one of them.

The latest header tank part number - 5Q0 121 407 'M' which all header tanks supersede to is without silicate.
I wonder if they have changed the coolant service schedule also?
 

RUM4MO

Active Member
Jun 4, 2008
7,970
1,060
South Scotland
Or/and evolved the coolant so that this silicate boost is not required?

Really that is why I keep enquiring as to the when/why/which version of coolant and maybe which engine types that surrounds this general subject.
 
Lecatona HPFP (High-pressure Fuel Pump Upgrades)