Seat leon FR 170bhp CR TDI Tuning Twin channel Box
- Thread starter FlameRevenge
- Start date
Well I've checked and 200ftlb toque x 4500 rpm / 5252 comes out at 171.36 so it sounds right.
Or 295ftlb x 2000rpm / 5252 is 113bhp which is correct as per the graph
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or 295ftlb x 2000rpm / 5252 is 113bhp which is correct as per the graph
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lol so the question that doesnt answer is, is that BHP or WHP, does anyone on here know!?
I'm 99% sure it's bhp as the link I will put its crafoo's RR at awesome and they said his ran very well for a stage 1 and his is defo bhp.
And that's RR crosses over at the magical 5252rpm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that's RR crosses over at the magical 5252rpm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
wasn't there a thread many moons ago about a custard code map producing more torque but no extra bhp?
If the map is in bhp and it is that bad, may be worth having it put back to standard, sure Awesome can do it, and leave the box on?
If the map is in bhp and it is that bad, may be worth having it put back to standard, sure Awesome can do it, and leave the box on?
http://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php?action=printpage;topic=35367.0
There's one here on mk5gti where his car made more torque but no more bhp
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's one here on mk5gti where his car made more torque but no more bhp
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
so a cr170 , allegedly remapped producing just over 170bhp and with a tuning box on it produces just over 170 bhp ,
could it be a 140 ??
I said that but he said not. Would make sense why is making 170ish bhp which they do and on DTUK they say the 170 'can' produce 450nm of torque which is 330 so would makes sense why it's only making 290ftlb.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What's your reg pal? Or how much is your tax? As 140's tax is £110 I think and 170's are £125-£130
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
It's ok 10 plate and my tax cost £130 for 12 months last time I renewed it few months back
Well it's taxed as a 170 lol. I would get your dealer to wipe the file or awesome ect and see what's it's like then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The 70mpg is the ecu lying to you, this has been explained to you countless times. The only way to see your actual increase in mpg is to fill the tank and see how many miles you get out of it compared to without the box. But it seems all my thoughts have been confirmed from your dyno.
If your "170bhp" FR has been remapped before.....why arnt you getting 200+ bhp?
If your "170bhp" FR has been remapped before.....why arnt you getting 200+ bhp?
The 70mpg can be shown from a video I made a while back when I got the car, the mpg I got with the box varied and also the results from the dyno measures the bhp on the wheel or clutch so it you want to find out the engine bhp which most vehicle manufacture state, multiply the dyno results by 115%, and also to find out the bhp of a car on the wheel multiply the engine bhp by 85% this varies with AWD
I've seen this video before. I'm not been funny but your sat at 52mph on a motorway I presume probably in the flat aswell. If you drove a full tank on the motorway then yeah you would avg 70mpg but this would take you over 10 hours and isn't accurate. I can get 101mpg doing a 5 mile trip to the train station but ain't accurate.
Like somebody has said you need to do a full up, reset your trip, brim it again when nearlly empty and see how much you've put in against the mileage done.
Sorry but sitting at 52mph on the motorway isn't accurate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Like somebody has said you need to do a full up, reset your trip, brim it again when nearlly empty and see how much you've put in against the mileage done.
Sorry but sitting at 52mph on the motorway isn't accurate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Similar threads
