Hi All
I have a '51' plate Skoda RS and have read all the comments you guys have made about it.
When I was looking into which car to get, I went out and test drove the Cupra. IMHO the interior was very dull and un-inspiring. The quality didn't seem upto much either. I had to laugh at how the dash would flex abround the instrument cluster. The RS's interior is a little un-practicle because of the amount of white in there, but at least it is different. The Cupra itself went fantastic, but I do not like the 6 speed box. Why have gear ratio's like that when all the power and torgue of the engine are low to mid on the rev range. The 5 speed box of the Skoda RS is much more suited to the engine.
I found the handling of the Cupra OK, but not in the same league as the RS. That also goes for the brakes as well. The Cupra (before the face lift) also IMO blends in with all the other cars on the road. It's presence on the road isn't really fealt, the RS however looks more like a 180bhp car.
The Skoda
badge for me was a
problem when I was looking for a new car. I had to drag my wife kicking and screaming into the showroom to look at it. But after the test drive we were both converted. I know use the Skoda
badge to my favour. Nothing better than blowing away a BMW in a Skoda.
Because of my Skoda RS, three of my works collegues have gone out and had Skoda RS's themselves. They were that impressed. Two of which went out and test drove the Cupra also.
Now, IMO the Skoda is the better car, but I am biassed. All the magazines I have read seem to agree. I would like to go and test drive the 'MY03' model of Cupra or even the Cupra R as I have heard the handling has been sharpened up.
PS Doesn't the latest road test (can't remember which magazine) of the Skoda RS, ST170 and Cupra, put the RS as having the highest residual value over the 3 years (I could be wrong).
Just my 2p's worth