hmmmmmm
for me its the reverse..car was smooth before the bypass, afterwards it jerked/stuttered and i couldnt hear the dv loud enough. eventually i thought enough was enough so switched it back. and im glad i did.
Ahh thats a bummer, dont know how I'd manage if I couldn't hear my dump valve when I was reversing!
haha!
Anyway,
I just tried this today, and to be honest I'm split as to whether or not I prefer it bypassed....
Dump valve definitely sounds different, although to be honest I don't think it releases any quicker... (I'm presently using very thin vac hose, as unipart only had about 2mm in stock, so this might explain why it is a little delayed in opening) although I see what people mean about the 'crack' sort of sound it makes when dumping, sounds quite nice...
I originally just stuck the whole metre of hose on, and there was a slight bit of turbo chatter when letting off (like half a second of chatter, followed by dump) which you can now barely hear after cutting pipe short... which makes me wonder if the crack sound we can hear is just a combination of a split second of turbo chatter (one or two chambers venting back up the TIP) followed by the DV...
I know that people say the DV should react quicker with all the boomf bypassed, but I do wonder if this is infact the opposite, and with the
help of the vacuum reservoir, the N249 actually manages to open the DV quicker? the reservoir acting as a
store of extra vacuum to suck the DV open sooner?
Obviously, being a bit of a retard, I have no mechanical back up for this, just a few thoughts going through my head after having a listen tonight....
Views on this anyone?