LOL. We are here to spend your cash and still save you cash at the same time
Honestly, on Wide Open Throttle the EvoMS is loud and the flutter on light lift of is great. You hear the dump from the re-circ when you lift off under boost and if you are quick through the gears you hear the mix of the too as there is a little compressor stall
It does everything you want from an induction kit. I've never heard of one fail or give an issue.
If I'm honest most intake changes seem to be "keeping up with the joneses" or "whats hot at the minute".
The Evoms has been tried and tested for years and until the revo came on the go it was what everyone wanted. Then someone gets a Revo and guess what.... everyone wants it. LOL
I'm not bashing the revo intake, I'm sure its great - just as great as the Evoms and others out there.
Ceramic coating in theory is fantastic, I've used in on exhaust manifolds before, but on the intake pipe you have to question how effective it is for actual intake temps - the biggest issue here is the temp of the air being taken at the cone. The hot air in the engine bay is the biggest issue and the best solution is a cold air feed and vent is the best solution - feed to supply fresh cold air and vent to remove stale air and provide a circulation path. Not as easy as you would imagine unless you want a cone sticking through the bonnet
Most "back to back" comparisons done are actually a bit subjective - for exampe go run a car on a dyno 3 times back to back and see if you get 3 identical results.... You wont. Temps, heat soak, tyre pressures all change and have an impact. The ECU its self will adjust to certain factors and this will have an effect.
So a "back to back" does not always show everything. If you did say Revo - Evoms - Revo - Evoms and the both of one type showed an advantage over the other I'd be more inclined to believe that test.... but it wont. In engineering we never follow a single 1 v 1 result. We have to do 3 of any comparison and then average the results and even then we need a pretty consistant result accross all 3 and then we average it. If the result is not close and the equipment has not changed then a perameter such as temp must equate to the difference
Just a little subjective view to the argument