I've been behind a mk5 gti, from 65 to 110, I easily kept up, even lifted. So at lower speeds, where the tdi is king, it should be a walk over, but I'm revo'd.
and how do you know that the mk5 in front of you was flooring it????
I've been behind a mk5 gti, from 65 to 110, I easily kept up, even lifted. So at lower speeds, where the tdi is king, it should be a walk over, but I'm revo'd.
I've got my FR mapped and i have managed 0-60 in 7 seconds dead (off GPS timing) but that will no doubt be argued by someone who knows better.
That'll be me then! The GPS takes time to catch up and measures your speed using S=D/T, so not accurate enough to do a 0-60 - not to mention human error in timing!
I'm quite surprised by this, so a 150 BHP one would be quicker and the 170 BHP quicker still?I had a golf, 130pd, just as fast as my standard LCR up the 1/4 mile.
well 0.168 slower!
I'm quite surprised by this, so a 150 BHP one would be quicker and the 170 BHP quicker still?
What times were you getting?
Funny how all diesel drivers realise the power and speed of the petrol cars and respect that they are generally quicker, but the petrol heads refuse to accept that diesels are getting quicker and are becoming a match for them.
People can speak of their times or race results, yet they get discarded because they aren't petrol.
Shame.
The 210 LCR is 165 BHP/tonne
It's book 0-62 is 7.3 secs.
So not too sure that the re mapped TDI would do it that quickly
A remapped LCR is not that much faster to 60 than a standard one but above its a different story