I did the dual air feed mod to an unmolested Dynatwist on the weekend but only managed 192 g/sec
. Hopefully better results to come when i modify the housing. i need to beat 218g/sec to maintain the same performance as my jetex open cone. It was warm though.
. Hopefully better results to come when i modify the housing. i need to beat 218g/sec to maintain the same performance as my jetex open cone. It was warm though.
Disapointing results Carl
I don't know how we managed between 210-220 with unmolested housings. All seem to be different but like you say... Temps make a big difference.
I don't know how we managed between 210-220 with unmolested housings. All seem to be different but like you say... Temps make a big difference.
I did the dual air feed mod to an unmolested Dynatwist on the weekend but only managed 192 g/sec
your using the larger maf housing though aren't you? so how would you convert that to if you were using the 3" maf?
daz463
Guest
+1
+2
i hope they will be anyway, it seems to be worth the effort tho, got some good comments off people even tho it does look fairly standard compared to yours and Nicks!
Hoping to make it the nationals, tho i am spose to be moving house on the 17th so not sure how to work both together,
be interesting, really should get my priorities in order......................so i'll see you there then 
Disapointing results Carl
I don't know how we managed between 210-220 with unmolested housings. All seem to be different but like you say... Temps make a big difference.
Hadn't you and Nick drilled holes in the end of yours though Aaron??
i think the bigger MAF housing is less rescrictive so needs to be bigger to run standard figures. i ran 219 with a standard MAF than 220 with the larger ali MAF housing...both on the same sensor.
i cant remember what figures i ran before drilling those holes ED, i didnt label the logs well enough
i cant remember what figures i ran before drilling those holes ED, i didnt label the logs well enough
HAHAHA I suffer with that too.....LOL!!
I'm trying to keep a low profile in another persons ride thread so i'll only comment on mods relevant to Probees car too.
Sorry Probee. Johnathon... i'll start my own dodgy ride thread soon.
I'm trying to keep a low profile in another persons ride thread so i'll only comment on mods relevant to Probees car too.
Sorry Probee. Johnathon... i'll start my own dodgy ride thread soon.
im lost but no worries buddy
you do need a thread, i want to keep up with your tinkering...
without WMI and running timing 6 boost 9 on a new filter and boost pipework the car seems to be flying but the flows gone back to how it was.
i tried swapping back to the old filter and the flow went back to 235gs, i think the old filter has had it (to much blowing out with an airline) so will not be using it.
heres some logs with the new filter. it feels very good on boost but is in desperate need of meth, its hot out there
i tried swapping back to the old filter and the flow went back to 235gs, i think the old filter has had it (to much blowing out with an airline
) so will not be using it. heres some logs with the new filter. it feels very good on boost but is in desperate need of meth, its hot out there
Code:
Wednesday 1 July 2009 20:47:19
1ML 906 032 A 1.8l R4/5VT 01 0001
Group A: '002 Group B: '115
RPM Load Inj. On Time Mass Flow RPM Load Absolute Pres. Absolute Pres.
TIME TIME
MARKER STAMP /min % ms g/s STAMP /min % mbar mbar
15.74 3840 88 7.48 69.69 16.16 4000 111.3 1760 1380
16.56 4120 124.1 9.86 103.08 16.96 4320 153.4 2260 1930
17.36 4560 191.7 15.98 175.69 17.76 4800 191.7 2490 2440
18.16 5080 191.7 17.34 192.36 18.58 5320 191.7 2450 2370
18.98 5520 191.7 16.32 207.33 19.38 5720 191.7 2380 2280
19.78 5920 187.2 15.98 212.61 20.18 6080 180.5 2320 2300
20.58 6240 178.9 15.3 217.72 20.98 6440 176.7 2280 2230
21.39 6560 175.9 14.96 220.25 21.79 6680 166.9 1000 2230
22.19 6160 12 1.36 0 22.59 5240 13.5 1000 1190
97.83 3600 24.8 2.38 18.08 98.23 3600 28.6 1000 1030
98.63 3680 64.7 6.46 55.75 99.03 3760 107.5 2420 1400
99.43 3960 176.7 15.64 174.58 99.83 4280 191.7 2550 2540
100.24 4560 191.7 18.7 184.33 100.64 4800 191.7 2500 2500
101.04 5040 191.7 17 194.17 101.44 5240 191.7 2450 2370
101.84 5440 191.7 17 203.94 102.24 5680 191.7 2390 2360
102.64 5880 191.7 16.66 212.94 103.04 6040 187.2 2320 2240
103.46 6240 178.9 15.3 219.39 103.86 6400 174.4 2270 2240
104.26 6560 171.4 14.62 219.39 104.67 6720 175.2 2270 2200
105.07 6640 19.5 1.36 0 105.46 5400 118.8 2310 1470
105.87 5440 187.2 17 209.58 106.27 5560 191 2400 2350
Code:
Wednesday 1 July 2009 20:52:14
1ML 906 032 A 1.8l R4/5VT 01 0001
Group A: '003 Group B: '118
RPM Mass Flow Load Ign. Timing RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME TIME
MARKER STAMP /min g/s % °BTDC STAMP /min °C % mbar
14.87 3320 37.44 19.2 34.5 14.47 3240 39 0 1230
15.67 3520 42.67 20.4 32.3 15.27 3400 38 0 1290
16.47 3760 75.81 54.9 29.3 16.07 3600 37 0 1350
17.27 4200 194.33 100 6.8 16.87 3960 37 95.3 1860
18.09 4800 185.97 100 6.8 17.69 4520 39 89.8 2540
18.89 5280 203.22 100 6 18.49 5040 38 90.6 2410
19.69 5720 211.92 100 7.5 19.29 5480 39 91 2340
20.5 6080 219.47 100 9.8 20.1 5880 39 94.1 2290
21.3 6400 221.92 99.6 10.5 20.9 6240 41 95.3 2260
Last edited:
Thats hot intakes mate! keep your filter, i want to put it on mine and log
Bet you cant wait to get ur car back
Bet you cant wait to get ur car back
forgot to say, it didnt go in because when they looked in the box the rods were tfsi not 1.8t....hehe next wednesday now
Hope you get your rods sorted soon.
Well after following your advice i modded my dynatwist housing and my g/sec increased to 208.........not bad. This is with my oversized maff housing and got me 1.4 bar at red line. So i wondered what this equalled in normal LCR maff language so i cleaned up my spare maff and put it in a stock housing and relogged, 225 g/sec was reached but the performance wasn't quite as good. Only managed 1.35 bar at red line.
The oversized maff tube clearly under reads but flows better indicated by the increased boost generated, helped not only from its increased csa but also being descreened.
A few more combinations to try, but as you say it bloody hot out there.
Well after following your advice i modded my dynatwist housing and my g/sec increased to 208.........not bad. This is with my oversized maff housing and got me 1.4 bar at red line. So i wondered what this equalled in normal LCR maff language so i cleaned up my spare maff and put it in a stock housing and relogged, 225 g/sec was reached but the performance wasn't quite as good. Only managed 1.35 bar at red line.
The oversized maff tube clearly under reads but flows better indicated by the increased boost generated, helped not only from its increased csa but also being descreened.
A few more combinations to try, but as you say it bloody hot out there.
some results at last.FYI i run the first screen but not the post sensor screen, im sure it makes no difference but you never know.
im now running solid (tubes) boost pipework, it seems very responsive now, im very impressed with it.
something that john (wilko) said about pressure drop got me thinking.... i would say it has made a reasonably big difference in responsiveness.
i think you can see in the logs it is boosting better?
i think you can see in the logs it is boosting better?
Similar threads
