Just a little food for thought in order to
help clarify Hooch's comment:-
Traditionally 99% of multivalve intake ports that you see have knife edged port divisions. The theory is the thinner the partition the easier that air passes over it.
The reality of it is air will pass over a knife edge like a radiused one but as it does it tumbles and rolls of the edge. The resultant effect means that the incoming air passing over it has to first overcome the turbulance around the area of the port division before entering the combustion chamber.
In a real life situation this means that you have a slower throttle response in respect to a port division that is nicely radiused.
For those that don't understand the science behind it, it's around you everyday of the year in the form of an airplane wing. Get the radius correct and you can get air to stick to the surface instead of lift away and get turbulance. It's called the coander effect. Anyone that dissagrees please show me an airplane wing with a knife edged leading edge.
As for porting small port vs standard large port. A ported small port gives better throttle response and a flatter less spikey power curve to that of a large port head due to improved port velocities. The result is a much more enjoyable road car. One of the reasons why VAG introduced the small port head for their 225hp road going cars instead of fitting a largeport head as found on the earlier 150hp models.
A correctly ported small port head will comfortably support 500hp on a GT3071R with 0.82 backhousing as proven by Andy with his 10.2 sec white MK1 golf. Compared to a standard big port head that runs out of puff at 450-460hp on the same turbo and boost settings.