Ye, I heard about that gang initiation thing too. . .
I think there's a clear split in this arguement.
1. The people, like me, who think retro-fit HIDs are too bright and can "dazzle" you (see explanation of dazzle below)
2. The people that like their HIDs a LOT because they can see clearly at night, like the sun is shining, and are in denial that their lights are too bright.
dazzle: a few people have said on here "how can you be dazzled??" because their lights are aligned properly, or are "expensive kits" and the projected light can be seen clearly on the road, and not in drivers' faces
this talk about "expensive kits" is really annoying. just because they cost more, they're not going to emit different light patterns!!! they are still too f***ing bright!!!
what I mean by dazzled and perhaps what other people mean is: not BLINDED so you can't see. just that if you look directly at the headlights in question (doesn't matter from which angle because the light unit is extremely bright - it doesn't have to be directly in the beam) even for a second, and then you look away, you will be left with an 'imprint' for lack of a better word, of the lights in your vision for a few seconds.
for example, if you look at the sun for a second then look away, you don't have 100% clear vision at whatever you are now looking at.
NOW. you could say "don't look directly at them then" . . . my point is there should not be vehicles on the road that you have a avoid looking at. I think they are blatently a
problem or no-one would be saying anything.
someone earlier (when defending HIDs) commented that they are often dazzled from behind from the likes of Porsches and Mercedes. . . . well they are OEM with projector headlights so if they dazzle you think what Leons with GIANT reflectors do to people!!!