Right guys... I'm just working through the spreadsheet that Chris sent me (cheers!) and I thought I'd make sure people are happy with the way I'm working this out.
Firstly... power and torque.
I'm taking book figures for each car as the standard figures, as that makes it fair.
For remapped, I'm looking at two of the biggest remapping companies - Revo and CC - and I'm taking the average of what their website quotes. I don't want to rely on Dyno Lottery produced figures or 'pub talk' figures as that's unfair. And we all know that one car will vary to the next and also that other mods will have an affect on the power produced.
So, I'm basing it on a Stage 1 remap of an otherwise standard car and I'm taking the average of the two companies mentioned. That way it's fair and consistent.
0-60 - Firstly, I hate this. I think its the biggest load of crap ever invented as a way of judging performance. Therefore, I think it's right to only include the standard figure for 0-60 and forget remapped 0-60.
Reasons being... firstly, driver skill will dictate most of this. Secondly, it's very, very hard to get an accurate figure. Thirdly, remapped TDi's often suffer with clutch slip which will affect the true 0-60 and make it look worse. And if you have to change the clutch, it's unfair to compare it to an LCR with a standard clutch.
Then there is MPG - Chris, in your spreadsheet you put three options; Taking it easy, Mixed Driving and Hammering it. The trouble with this is anything other than mixed driving is hard to get a real figure on, so is just guesswork. And as the idea of this comparison was to keep it factual, I suggest we keep the MPG to average only. Plus, this means more to potential buyers. Nobody hammers it all the time and nobody drives lightly all the time, so an average MPG would be more fair. This will be worked out based upon the results of the thread running at the moment.
And lastly... once this is done, I'd like to open it up to the LC too. It's not fair that we don't include that as it is an option for somebody wanting to sit between the two cars in their purchasing decision. So once we have finished this spreadsheet I think we could ask LC owners to add their facts and figures. If everyone else involved in this agrees?
This isn't a hard and fast 'this is what we're doing' as this is a group effort... I just thought I'd put my thoughts down for you lot to consider
Firstly... power and torque.
I'm taking book figures for each car as the standard figures, as that makes it fair.
For remapped, I'm looking at two of the biggest remapping companies - Revo and CC - and I'm taking the average of what their website quotes. I don't want to rely on Dyno Lottery produced figures or 'pub talk' figures as that's unfair. And we all know that one car will vary to the next and also that other mods will have an affect on the power produced.
So, I'm basing it on a Stage 1 remap of an otherwise standard car and I'm taking the average of the two companies mentioned. That way it's fair and consistent.
0-60 - Firstly, I hate this. I think its the biggest load of crap ever invented as a way of judging performance. Therefore, I think it's right to only include the standard figure for 0-60 and forget remapped 0-60.
Reasons being... firstly, driver skill will dictate most of this. Secondly, it's very, very hard to get an accurate figure. Thirdly, remapped TDi's often suffer with clutch slip which will affect the true 0-60 and make it look worse. And if you have to change the clutch, it's unfair to compare it to an LCR with a standard clutch.
Then there is MPG - Chris, in your spreadsheet you put three options; Taking it easy, Mixed Driving and Hammering it. The trouble with this is anything other than mixed driving is hard to get a real figure on, so is just guesswork. And as the idea of this comparison was to keep it factual, I suggest we keep the MPG to average only. Plus, this means more to potential buyers. Nobody hammers it all the time and nobody drives lightly all the time, so an average MPG would be more fair. This will be worked out based upon the results of the thread running at the moment.
And lastly... once this is done, I'd like to open it up to the LC too. It's not fair that we don't include that as it is an option for somebody wanting to sit between the two cars in their purchasing decision. So once we have finished this spreadsheet I think we could ask LC owners to add their facts and figures. If everyone else involved in this agrees?
This isn't a hard and fast 'this is what we're doing' as this is a group effort... I just thought I'd put my thoughts down for you lot to consider