craig-pd130 said:I wonder if they had to change to a Pierburg MAF halfway through the race
hehe
craig-pd130 said:I wonder if they had to change to a Pierburg MAF halfway through the race
Was economy, economy, economy for me when I got mine ... was VERY surprised with my little car. Will DEFO be buying one again, with more potential for poke obviously.mark sheerin said:diesel is on the march..and for many people for the self same reasons I swapped....performance AND economy
Not sure on my maths here.... but im pretty sure the FQ340 runs at a "slightly" higher boost than 1.5bar to achive 355lb....225 said:I'm sorry but what a load of b0ll0x!
Lets compare, they are allowed to run 5.5l in capacity as opposed to 4l and are running 1.5bar of boost compared to 0.5bar!!
Q the torque this, torque that rubbish that gets bandied around. Hmmm 811lb of torque from a blown 5.5l in a full on race car. EVO FQ400 355lb torque from a 2.0l road car now you do the maths what has a higher output per litre.
1.5 Litre F1 engines with approx 5-600lbs of torque and that was 20 years ago.
Maybe in a few years when the rules are the same for both types of engine then we can all get excited about driving tractors round race tracks
225 said:I'm sorry but what a load of b0ll0x!
Lets compare, they are allowed to run 5.5l in capacity as opposed to 4l and are running 1.5bar of boost compared to 0.5bar!!
Q the torque this, torque that rubbish that gets bandied around. Hmmm 811lb of torque from a blown 5.5l in a full on race car. EVO FQ400 355lb torque from a 2.0l road car now you do the maths what has a higher output per litre.
1.5 Litre F1 engines with approx 5-600lbs of torque and that was 20 years ago.
Maybe in a few years when the rules are the same for both types of engine then we can all get excited about driving tractors round race tracks
225 said:1.5 Litre F1 engines with approx 5-600lbs of torque and that was 20 years ago.
225 said:I dont doubt it is an impressive engine but as you say Mark the rest of the car plays a far bigger part let alone the driver as well, so this new mystical diesel engine is good but not the sudden holy grail of racing some people seem to think it is.
sssstew said:oh no.... please no petrol vs diesel......
slimjim said:
Thing is over the years FAR more cash has been poured into Petrol research. It's going to take a LONG time before diesel catches up.
Then we will probably have no diesel left
Don't fall into the "Top Gear" trap of comparing a light aircraft to a washing machine or hair-dryer!Cupra_power said:there already is a diesel motor used in aviation. I guess the would make the plane an industrial hair drier as opposed to just a normal hair dryer.
Fl@pper said:ill stand up for the petrolheads mark (well said M0rk)