"At worst, buyers will have to cover at least 30,000 miles a year to recoup the cost."
Heh, with that sort of milage I don't think the DPF would be a
problem.
THAT said, the sort of person who would be conned (yes, conned) into buying this car would probably also be the sort of person to never take the revs above 1750.
Low resistance tyres? No thanks! I prefer to have some stopping power - ditchfinders do nothing for me.
So basically, it's still slow, costs more and to get any benefit out of it you have to drive it more anyway?
I hope no one buys it. I can't see how anyone could justify spending ~£5000 to save £200 a year on fuel. (or something).