£16k to £17k?
They were around £26k new, so should be roughly 50% of their value at 3 years with 36k miles.
It is the nature of the beast unfortunately.Went to drive one yesterday. Lovely car, really do like the FR 190 estate but the company were a pain in the .....
Doesn't seem like dealers haggle anymore and then they wanted £600 on top for a 2 year warranty on a £19,000 car. The area I work in I sell products at £500 ish and the warranty is 12 months. Extremely pushy with add-ons etc so ile avoid that company. Shame Seat themselves had one but it sold whilst I was test driving the other one. Seat offer 2 years warranty as standard.
The particular company don't seem to have good reviews when it comes to using the warranty as well. Car was insanely nice and good condition but the company put me off getting it from themselves.
It is the nature of the beast unfortunately.
The dealer/salesperson gets commission on warranties, finance, paint protection etc and everything else they can add in to the sale.
And with the current silly lead times on new cars - good condition used cars seem to be holding high prices.
Maybe more than 50% in the current climate with very long wait times for new cars and fewer new cars being built. Some people are hanging on to their existing cars or buying good quality used cars instead of waiting for a new car, so with increased demand and fewer good used cars feeding into the used car market, prices are holding up pretty well.They were around £26k new, so should be roughly 50% of their value at 3 years with 36k miles.
Also bear in mind if your budget is up to £20k new shape Leon ST is available, albeit the 1.5 versions.
As I've mentioned before those FR STs are overpriced for the age of the car. I got a 20 plate Cupra for £24k.
I can't imagine the 2.0 TSI FR St being much better on fuel than a Cupra other than the additional drain from the 4 wheel drive if you get the ST. Each to their own but for 7k miles a year the difference in fuel cost fron 35mpg to 30mpg (as a guess that the cupra will be 5mpg worse) you're looking at £250 a year in fuel costs. For around £20 a month additional fuel I'd be going for a Cupra for sure. It may well make more than the increased fuel cost back in its depreciation compared to the FR.Wanted the 2l really as I'm swapping a mk5 GTI golf but then the mpg is a little low for me on a cupra (FR ST seemed to be the best of both worlds). I'm using it for light business use as well. Around 7k miles a year
I can't imagine the 2.0 TSI FR St being much better on fuel than a Cupra other than the additional drain from the 4 wheel drive if you get the ST. Each to their own but for 7k miles a year the difference in fuel cost fron 35mpg to 30mpg (as a guess that the cupra will be 5mpg worse) you're looking at £250 a year in fuel costs. For around £20 a month additional fuel I'd be going for a Cupra for sure. It may well make more than the increased fuel cost back in its depreciation compared to the FR.
Insurance is likely to cost more on a Cupra too.I wanted something a little cheaper to run than my GTI but without losing too much power. Cupras tend to have 19" wheels as well I think as well as higher road tax. MPG on honest John is 28mpg where as the FR 2L is 35-38 average.
Insurance is likely to cost more on a Cupra too.
I wanted something a little cheaper to run than my GTI but without losing too much power. Cupras tend to have 19" wheels as well I think as well as higher road tax. MPG on honest John is 28mpg where as the FR 2L is 35-38 average.
Sounds the same as my 2005 GTI golf on the MPG