basically no, it went against all the research i had done when buying my kit but im never one to say yours never did that or the rollers must be wrong. thats why i said over 400 and i dont know if hes changed his turbo. i wasnt aware of the losses added, what rr was that?
we have seen some amazing figures of late with smaller turbos running loads of timing and water meth.
i would still recommend the GT2871 though..
the dyno of the 400bhp one is in his build thread. the losses are huge over the atw figures (which are realistic) I dont know which dyno it was. Difficult to see how 341-344atw grows into over 440bhp, but hey ho
i am not seeing massive numbers on my dyno, on cars with all the trimmings, wmi etc etc, but they do correlate to airflows, and std cars are still making std power on the same dyno. there is so much overstating of figures about these days.
gt3071 on the same BD hardware, on 2ltr leon cupra, 375atw, and a realistic 412bhp on my rollers..
http://www.badger-5.com/bin/Dyno/DynoIT - S400LCR.pdf believe what you will. i know reality however.
gt2871 is reasonable turbo for sure, on 0.6x hotside its pretty drivable, but gt3071 is not that diferent on 0.6x hotside and give so much more. tough call for me over the progression from 2860 to 2871 to 3071. I personally leap over the 2871 to 3071 and leave the 2860 as entry level
just folks who get "sold" a 400bhp kit and in the same breath 2871 is mentioned, they will be dissapointed when it falls way short of their 'goal' unless its dyno'd on the same happy as hell dyno of course