had the lcr stage 1'd a couple of mounths ago and had it on the rr at the weekend and an wanting to compair results . i got 251.5 bhp and 240.9lbft and i thought it seemed a bit low
You'd have been better off going to Star and getting a guaranteed 265BHP and 270 ft-lbs
No physically use Star map, well well proven and they have got the best out of a KO3s.Do you mean use their rolling road or get a star remap? I'd personally stick to CC, Revo or AmD myself...
Anyway most dynos aren't accurate so your cars probably okay anyway
Could you ask the garage who did the remap to have a look first - they might find something if there is a problem (remember it could just be the dyno). Out of interest what were your torque and power figures at the wheels?
Hiya mate had mine cc stage 1 this year at the hq in Feb, couldnt go on thier rollers as the floor had cracked due to a flood. Anyway had mine on a set of rollers near me that had been calibrated the week before and i made 239bhp at the flywheel and 290ft/lbs of torque. Was made up with the torque figure but not so much the bhp. Emailed cc and they told me 'from the logs off your vehicle on the day we did the software we were making approx 195g/s with 1.5bar spike and holding approx 1 bar towards the top end dependant on load'. Sorry dont know what 1.5bar is in psi. I then went back to the guy who roaded my car and he show me that the figure you want to look at its at the wheel as the flywheel figure is calculated by adding your losses onto the at the wheel figure if u get me! He then said you could take it back to cc and have it roaded there but if they have there losses set at a higher percentage then you would get a better flywheel figure. SO basically i came to the assumptions the car feels miles quicker im pleased with it even though the bhp shoulda been 265-270 according to cc and that rolling roads are a waste of time and money just for power runs!!!!!!
im happy with the car but im wanting them to sort out the boost and the car running lean then i'll be happy