there is nothing wrong with AT it's just not for sports cars.
Says who ?
there is nothing wrong with AT it's just not for sports cars.
My (old) 1989 Renault 5 GT Turbo - 1.4 Turbocharged engine - Mildly modified - 0-60 in 6.5 seconds!
If an engine setup almost 20 years old can achieve that kind of performance, then come 2008/2009, with 20 EXTRA years of research and development (+ technology) to play with, you'd have thought the engineers could work wonders with a 1400CC engine as a base.
there is nothing wrong with AT it's just not for sports cars.
Says who ?
Says "SUBARU","MITSUBISHI","BMW","NISSAN" - Have you heard of them![]()
Looks like Seat are doing to the Cupra what Honda just did to the Type-R. Make an uglier car that has just about zero improvements and from what people are saying not much room for potential performance upgrades either![]()
Cant say the EP3 is better than the FD2 CTR though!![]()
Anyway back on topic - Saw a lime green MK5 today and it looked horrible![]()
Says "SUBARU","MITSUBISHI","BMW","NISSAN" - Have you heard of them![]()
saw a mk5 sc ibiza in black at the dealers today and it looked mint![]()
So when a rally car driver changes gear he uses a clutch pedal yeah?
..........