Was a VAG open day @ GotBoost on sunday, myself and 3 ibizas ran, so a good comparison.
My logs....
First run +3° timing via lemmiwinks...
Result...
236.2bhp - 290.8lbs/ft
Second run....
As above, with 3.75° timing added.
Didnt log 002 as it looked good first run so thought i'd better off having a quicker sample rate with two blocks...
Result...
242.1bhp - 294.8lbs/ft
Third run thought i'd push it and see how an extra 0.75° of timing would affect it...
Result...
237.7bhp - 287.1lbs/ft
Looked like 4.5° extra of timing was just slightly too much in the end making run 2 the best. So i guess the maf x 1.32 looks pretty good, 184g/s x 1.32= 243bhp.
The graphs....
Fuelling looks very good doesnt it.
My logs....
First run +3° timing via lemmiwinks...
Code:
Sunday 11 October 2009 14:08:35
6K0 906 032 AA 1.8L 20VT EU3 02 0002
Group A: '002 Group B: '020 Group C: '118
RPM Load Inj. On Time Mass Flow Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME TIME TIME
Marker STAMP /min % ms g/s STAMP CF CF CF CF STAMP /min °C % mbar
20.8 1640 84.2 9.43 29.61 21.2 0 0 0 0 20.4 1560 24 90.2 1050
22 1640 95.5 9.84 30.64 22.4 0 0 0 0 21.6 1640 24 100 1260
23.2 2080 111.3 11.48 47.11 23.6 0 0 0 0 22.8 1920 23 100 1390
24.4 2560 178.2 20.09 92.69 24.79 3 0 3 3 24 2400 24 100 1860
25.6 3040 191.7 23.78 140.25 25.99 3 0 3 3 25.19 2880 24 82.4 2540
26.79 3480 191.7 23.78 149.72 27.21 3 0 3 3 26.39 3360 24 80.4 2540
27.99 3920 191.7 24.19 158.92 28.39 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 27.59 3760 26 77.6 2530
29.19 4280 191.7 23.37 164.17 29.61 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 28.79 4160 27 72.2 2450
30.41 4680 191.7 22.14 175.5 30.79 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 29.99 4560 29 64.3 2290
31.59 5080 187.2 21.32 179.08 31.99 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 31.19 4920 30 56.9 2220
32.79 5440 175.2 20.09 179.08 33.19 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 32.39 5320 32 50.6 2130
33.99 5800 164.7 18.86 182.83 34.39 2.3 0 2.3 2.3 33.59 5680 33 45.5 2030
35.19 6160 155.6 18.04 184.44 35.59 0.8 0 0 1.5 34.79 6080 35 48.2 1940
36.39 6560 148.1 16.81 184.14 36.79 0 0 0 0 35.99 6440 36 52.9 1860
37.59 6880 141.4 15.99 186.5 37.99 0 0 0 0 37.19 6800 37 58 1830
18.4 1680 46.6 4.51 15.11 18.8 0 0 0 0 18 1640 24 0 1050
236.2bhp - 290.8lbs/ft
Second run....
As above, with 3.75° timing added.
Didnt log 002 as it looked good first run so thought i'd better off having a quicker sample rate with two blocks...
Code:
Sunday 11 October 2009 14:16:18
6K0 906 032 AA 1.8L 20VT EU3 03 0002
Group A: '020 Group B: '118
Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME TIME
Marker STAMP CF CF CF CF STAMP /min °C % mbar
17.18 0 0 0 2.3 16.78 1680 23 1.2 1270
17.98 0 0 3 2.3 17.58 1720 23 1.2 1290
18.78 3 0 3 1.5 18.38 1720 22 96.9 1350
19.58 3 0 3 1.5 19.18 1880 22 100 1410
20.38 3 0 3 1.5 19.98 2200 23 100 1610
21.18 3 3 3 1.5 20.78 2560 24 90.2 2120
21.98 3 3 3 1.5 21.58 2880 24 82.4 2540
22.78 3 3 2.3 1.5 22.38 3200 25 81.6 2540
23.58 2.3 3 2.3 0.8 23.18 3480 26 80 2540
24.38 2.3 3 2.3 0.8 23.98 3760 27 77.6 2540
25.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 24.8 4040 29 74.9 2490
26 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 25.6 4280 30 69 2440
26.78 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 26.38 4560 31 63.9 2300
27.59 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 27.19 4800 32 58.4 2270
28.39 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 27.99 5080 33 52.9 2190
29.19 2.3 2.3 2.3 0.8 28.79 5320 34 47.1 2130
29.99 2.3 2.3 1.5 0.8 29.59 5560 34 43.5 2080
30.79 1.5 2.3 1.5 0 30.39 5800 36 43.1 2010
31.59 1.5 2.3 1.5 0 31.19 6040 37 45.5 1950
32.39 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 31.99 6280 38 49 1890
33.19 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 32.79 6520 39 51.4 1860
33.99 1.5 1.5 0.8 0 33.59 6760 39 52.9 1850
Result...
242.1bhp - 294.8lbs/ft
Third run thought i'd push it and see how an extra 0.75° of timing would affect it...
Code:
Sunday 11 October 2009 14:20:41
6K0 906 032 AA 1.8L 20VT EU3 03 0002
Group A: '020 Group B: '118
Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME TIME
Marker STAMP CF CF CF CF STAMP /min °C % mbar
0 1.5 0 1.5 4.5 0.4 1680 24 1.2 1310
0.8 4.5 0 0.8 4.5 1.2 1720 24 92.5 1320
1.6 4.5 3 0.8 4.5 2 1720 24 86.7 1400
2.4 4.5 3 0.8 3.8 2.8 1920 24 100 1460
3.2 4.5 3 0.8 3.8 3.6 2240 24 100 1680
4 4.5 3 0.8 3.8 4.4 2560 26 89.8 2210
4.8 3.8 3 3.8 3.8 5.2 2880 27 82.7 2540
5.6 3.8 3 3.8 3.8 6 3200 27 81.6 2540
6.4 3.8 3 3.8 3.8 6.8 3480 29 80 2540
7.2 3.8 2.3 3.8 3.8 7.6 3800 30 77.6 2540
8 3.8 2.3 3.8 3.8 8.4 4040 31 74.5 2510
8.8 3 2.3 3.8 3.8 9.2 4320 33 69 2440
9.6 3 2.3 3.8 3 10 4560 33 63.5 2310
10.4 3 2.3 3 3 10.8 4800 34 57.3 2260
11.2 3 2.3 3 3 11.6 5040 36 51.4 2210
12 3 2.3 3 3 12.4 5320 37 44.3 2150
12.8 3 2.3 3 3 13.2 5560 38 40 2100
13.6 3 2.3 3 3 14 5800 39 38.4 2020
14.4 3 2.3 3 3 14.8 6040 39 39.6 1950
15.2 3 1.5 3 3 15.6 6280 41 42 1910
16 2.3 1.5 3 2.3 16.4 6520 42 45.1 1870
16.8 2.3 1.5 2.3 2.3 17.2 6760 44 47.5 1840
Result...
237.7bhp - 287.1lbs/ft
Looked like 4.5° extra of timing was just slightly too much in the end making run 2 the best. So i guess the maf x 1.32 looks pretty good, 184g/s x 1.32= 243bhp.
The graphs....
Fuelling looks very good doesnt it.