Hi all, sorry to labour on this point ....hopefully I can add a new angle to an old subject...
Im in the market for one of these devices, but none of the threads ive found are giving me the arguments for or against that I think are valid or applicable for me.
Ive searched the forum and read the reviews and I have to say - "Whats the point in a GPS camera detector ?" . That question is one i feel like yelling! Surely everyone has missed the point here?
The real benefit of the detectors in my opionion is the ones that can DETECT and not read from an out of date database of "hotspots". It really doesnt matter how recently you updated your device, it is still out of date, and cannot DETECT the hazrds that are there. The mobile cameras probably nab more people than the fixed ones do becuase we all see the fixed ones and know where they are....Also, if a camera is out of film/service, it wont tell you this unlike a detector which will do. Straight away Im seeing serious design flaws with the idea of GPS detector.
Personally I think this is a major design flaw on the scale of putting hydrogen in a Zepplin. I also think its a total con that somehow became a successful product.
One of my collegaues was a traffic police sergeant [sp?] in her previous incarnation, she said to me (after Id been caught and banned) that the laser detectors on modern hand held police cameras are only limited in the distance they are effective at by the horizon. The horizon is 3 miles away.
Now, I just read that the Snooper S5R can detect lazer and radar at 2 miles. How many roads are there where you wouldnt spot the copper, and he could get you in that dastardly mile that exists between his range and your range ? Not many i would think.
So....my point and questions are...
Why is everyone so keen on GPS (Road angel etc) and why do people not rate Snoopers so much when they seem to be the only real solution ?
Thanks
Mark
Im in the market for one of these devices, but none of the threads ive found are giving me the arguments for or against that I think are valid or applicable for me.
Ive searched the forum and read the reviews and I have to say - "Whats the point in a GPS camera detector ?" . That question is one i feel like yelling! Surely everyone has missed the point here?
The real benefit of the detectors in my opionion is the ones that can DETECT and not read from an out of date database of "hotspots". It really doesnt matter how recently you updated your device, it is still out of date, and cannot DETECT the hazrds that are there. The mobile cameras probably nab more people than the fixed ones do becuase we all see the fixed ones and know where they are....Also, if a camera is out of film/service, it wont tell you this unlike a detector which will do. Straight away Im seeing serious design flaws with the idea of GPS detector.
Personally I think this is a major design flaw on the scale of putting hydrogen in a Zepplin. I also think its a total con that somehow became a successful product.
One of my collegaues was a traffic police sergeant [sp?] in her previous incarnation, she said to me (after Id been caught and banned) that the laser detectors on modern hand held police cameras are only limited in the distance they are effective at by the horizon. The horizon is 3 miles away.
Now, I just read that the Snooper S5R can detect lazer and radar at 2 miles. How many roads are there where you wouldnt spot the copper, and he could get you in that dastardly mile that exists between his range and your range ? Not many i would think.
So....my point and questions are...
Why is everyone so keen on GPS (Road angel etc) and why do people not rate Snoopers so much when they seem to be the only real solution ?
Thanks
Mark