Aesthetics will always be subjective, but basic design concepts can at least illustrate a personal preference with an explanation that makes sense.
- The MK1; in its heyday, I have always found it to be very charming / inviting. Retro-actively, I guess you could say it was sort of what the new Mazda 3 is doing now as a style statement.
- The MK2; I used to have one and freaking loved it. Generally speaking I prefer lines and silhouettes which FLOW without interruption. The MK2's side view silhouette windshield and arching roofline certainly adhere to that principle as does the smooth flowing door panel crease. Basically, this is also why I loved the look of the Astra J, which to me, was very similar to the
MK2 Leon.
- The MK3; It's OK-ish tp me, but the 2nd crease at the C-pillar / tail light irks me to no end; because it's basically interrupting the flow of the bigger front crease. The overall silhouette seems box-ier than the MK2 which is why I like it a bit less.
- The MK4; Sigh.... it seems to try and pull off what the new Mazda 3 is doing so incredibly well as a style statement, but the new Leon falls flat on its face trying.....
Again... The MK4 has that interrupted crease line... breaking line flow. yuck..and although the design language features more organically sculpted lines, the overall silhouette proportions have become even MORE boxy (even Seat themselves said the A-pillars are now a bit less swept back/more straight). Why not go straight to a beveled 3 box design then?
Ironic, how I always hated the previous Mazda 3's with their sagging belt line/shoulder line, and I loved/liked the Seat MK2 & MK3, but now the roles have inversed and I dig the look of the new Mazda 3 but strongly dislike the MK4 Leon.
So, as a former MK2 lover/owner, the only contemporary Seat which could draw my interest would be the El Born since it also has that nice silhouette flow going on.