I recently replaced my maff with a new unit and was pleased to reach 246g/sec, this was a little aggressive boost wise in the mid range so i made adjustments with my mbc and limited peak boost to produce 237 g/sec.
i have run a non screened oversized maff housing in the past that always produced good results but obviously under read. So i descreened a stock maff housing to see what the results would be.
Standard maff housing.
RPM Mass Flow Load
TIME
STAMP /min g/s %
150.96 2920 80.53 93.7
151.67 3280 138.47 100
152.27 3760 171.19 100
152.88 4200 186.39 100
153.48 4640 193.42 100
154.08 5080 210.69 100
154.69 5480 224.39 100
155.29 5840 231.19 100
155.89 6160 234.11 99.6
156.5 6440 235.94 99.6
157.11 6720 237.78 99.6
RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME
STAMP /min °C % mbar
150.66 2800 24 67.1 1330
151.37 3120 24 95.3 1790
151.97 3480 25 79.6 2490
152.57 4000 24 83.5 2540
153.18 4440 24 82.4 2530
153.78 4880 24 86.7 2510
154.38 5320 24 95.3 2400
154.99 5680 24 95.3 2350
155.59 6000 24 95.3 2300
156.19 6320 26 95.3 2310
156.8 6600 27 95.3 2220
Descreened Maff
RPM Mass Flow Load
153.4 3440 172.25 100
154 3920 190.11 100
154.71 4480 205.11 100
155.31 4920 216.36 100
155.91 5360 235.06 100
156.52 5720 241.53 100
157.12 6080 250.64 100
157.72 6360 253.36 100
158.33 6640 255.89 99.6
RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
153.7 3680 24 5.1 2540
154.4 4240 23 5.1 2540
155.01 4720 23 5.1 2530
155.61 5120 24 5.1 2490
156.21 5520 24 5.1 2440
156.82 5880 24 5.1 2420
157.42 6240 26 5.1 2310
158.02 6520 27 5.1 2320
158.64 6720 27 0 2340
Descreened maff housing gives 255g/sec which is a nice gain. The cynical part of me says that since the meshing is there to straighten air flow into the maff, all i have done is messed with calibration. However when you see how much of a restriction the plastic and meshing is in the intake system it can be seen that air flow has simply increased. This is proved by the increase in turbo boost generated. More in = more out.
With further boost adjustments and an alteration to the intake system i'm looking for 270g/sec provided that the maff doesn't get maxed out.
i have run a non screened oversized maff housing in the past that always produced good results but obviously under read. So i descreened a stock maff housing to see what the results would be.
Standard maff housing.
RPM Mass Flow Load
TIME
STAMP /min g/s %
150.96 2920 80.53 93.7
151.67 3280 138.47 100
152.27 3760 171.19 100
152.88 4200 186.39 100
153.48 4640 193.42 100
154.08 5080 210.69 100
154.69 5480 224.39 100
155.29 5840 231.19 100
155.89 6160 234.11 99.6
156.5 6440 235.94 99.6
157.11 6720 237.78 99.6
RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
TIME
STAMP /min °C % mbar
150.66 2800 24 67.1 1330
151.37 3120 24 95.3 1790
151.97 3480 25 79.6 2490
152.57 4000 24 83.5 2540
153.18 4440 24 82.4 2530
153.78 4880 24 86.7 2510
154.38 5320 24 95.3 2400
154.99 5680 24 95.3 2350
155.59 6000 24 95.3 2300
156.19 6320 26 95.3 2310
156.8 6600 27 95.3 2220
Descreened Maff
RPM Mass Flow Load
153.4 3440 172.25 100
154 3920 190.11 100
154.71 4480 205.11 100
155.31 4920 216.36 100
155.91 5360 235.06 100
156.52 5720 241.53 100
157.12 6080 250.64 100
157.72 6360 253.36 100
158.33 6640 255.89 99.6
RPM Temperature Load Absolute Pres.
153.7 3680 24 5.1 2540
154.4 4240 23 5.1 2540
155.01 4720 23 5.1 2530
155.61 5120 24 5.1 2490
156.21 5520 24 5.1 2440
156.82 5880 24 5.1 2420
157.42 6240 26 5.1 2310
158.02 6520 27 5.1 2320
158.64 6720 27 0 2340
Descreened maff housing gives 255g/sec which is a nice gain. The cynical part of me says that since the meshing is there to straighten air flow into the maff, all i have done is messed with calibration. However when you see how much of a restriction the plastic and meshing is in the intake system it can be seen that air flow has simply increased. This is proved by the increase in turbo boost generated. More in = more out.
With further boost adjustments and an alteration to the intake system i'm looking for 270g/sec provided that the maff doesn't get maxed out.